- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Frontal Impact
Lateral Impact
Rear Impact
Comment
The passenger compartment of the TANG remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of all critical body areas for both the driver and front seat passenger. BYD showed good protection would be provided to the knees and femurs of occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the TANG would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and the rear passenger. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good. In the more severe side pole impact, protection was good or adequate for all critical parts of the body. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was adequate. The TANG has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. However, in Euro NCAP’s test, the heads of the driver and passenger hit each other and protection was rated as poor. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The TANG has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also has a system which applies the brakes after an impact, to avoid secondary collisions. BYD demonstrated that if the car entered water, the doors, if locked, could be opened within two minutes of power being lost but did not demonstrate the duration for which windows would remain functional.